MAWO
STATEMENT
MAWO's
Open Letter to Stopwar.ca
and the Canadian Peace Alliance(CPA)
APRIL 14, 2011
To Stopwar.ca and the Canadian Peace Alliance (CPA),
I
We in Mobilization Against War and Occupation
(MAWO) are sending you this open correspondence to
express the grave concerns we have with your
organizing of the April 9th demonstration in
Vancouver. Your approach and politics on this day
were without a doubt against the spirit of
building an antiwar, anti-occupation movement not
only in Canada but throughout the world.
Imperialist countries and their military fronts
such as NATO are beginning to sink their teeth
into Libya while continuing the brutal wars and
occupations in Afghanistan, Iraq, Haiti, Ivory
Coast, Somalia, Sudan, Palestine and beyond. This
is a crucial time for the antiwar movement and we
need an open and honest discussion or risk seeing
further capitulation to the pro-imperialist
political and military campaign against Libya.
The CPA’s cross-Canada participation in the April
9th International Day of Action called by the
United National Antiwar Committee (UNAC) in the
U.S. was a breakthrough in cross-border unified
action. We have been advocating for years that
working with U.S. groups and coalitions is an
essential aspect of a strategy to build a broad,
united and effective antiwar movement.
Thousands rallied in New York and San Francisco,
while coordinated rallies were held in 10 Canadian
and 6 Pakistani cities, as well as demonstrations
in Iraq on April 9th. These mobilizations built on
the momentum of other successful coordinated
rallies called by the ANSWER Coalition on March
19th. This broadly coordinated action has been
missing for too long from the antiwar movement in
Canada, and we fully endorse its continuation on a
hopefully increasingly frequent basis. However,
based on the events during the rally organized in
Vancouver by Stopwar.ca and the CPA’s public
statements regarding the current crisis and NATO
bombing in Libya, we are concerned that the
political direction of these actions in Canada is
unclear at best, and could even be understood at
worst as pro-war.
At the Stopwar.ca rally in Vancouver we saw that
two speakers invited by Stopwar.ca spent 15
minutes justifying and advocating IN FAVOUR of the
current NATO bombing of Libya. Do the following
quotations from the Stopwar.ca rally really have a
place at an antiwar rally occurring in the midst
of a bloody imperialist campaign to intervene in a
civil war and overthrow the independent government
of Libya?
- “If you don't want war on Libya, what is your
alternative?”
- “He [Gaddhafi] has an unbelievable media
machine, he spends billions and billions that
tries to paint the picture that NATO is bombing
Libyan people. NATO is not bombing Libyan people!”
- “This [the bombing of Libya] is not like Iraq,
this is not like Afghanistan, this is not a
foreign occupier coming onto our land!”
- “If you don't want those people [foreign forces]
to get inside of Libya and you want to stop them
you are saying, ‘Let Ghadafi kill us!’ ”
- “You are giving us the wrong message. You are
saying its okay for civilians to get killed but it
is not okay for NATO to help us!” -
“Do you have a heart?!” (shouted at someone
speaking against the bombing of Libya from the
crowd)
At least 10 people in the crowd responded to these
pro-war speakers by shouting, “Stop bombing
Libya!” while one of the more vocal critics of the
pro-war speakers who is a long-time social justice
organizer was surrounded and closed in on by three
Stopwar.ca marshals. Even after it was clear to
everyone involved what these pro-war Libyans were
advocating, the Stopwar.ca MCs invited yet another
one to speak!
Stopwar.ca and CPA co-chair Derrick O’Keefe spoke
at the end of the rally to confirm that they had
invited these speakers knowing full well the
pro-war message they were going to put forward. He
said, “We invited the Libyan speakers who we’ve
been in touch with even though there’s a
difference in opinion about NATO’s intervention,
we thought it was important for them to have their
say.” In fact, Derrick O'Keefe, and both of the
Stopwar.ca MC’s tried to justify this position to
the rally, as if the pro-war position on Libya is
somehow being unfairly under-represented. When
Derrick O'Keefe said “We know its our job to stay
on the streets and to bring the truth,” this
shouldn’t mean the so-called “truth” that the
government of Canada is putting forward by
participating in bombing the Libyan people!
Though Derrick O'Keefe mentioned that Stopwar.ca
as a coalition had voted to oppose imperialist
intervention in Libya, the time given to this
supposed position was nothing compared to what was
given to the pro-war Libyans. We must ask how
Stopwar.ca can justify writing a statement which
says they are “absolutely opposed to the NATO
bombing of Libya, which is a shocking violation of
the UN Charter and an act of war against a
sovereign country” and then give such a huge
amount of space to a pro-war message we can all
hear 24/7 if we turn on CNN, FOX News, BBC or any
of the other advocates of imperialist wars and
occupations.
There is no justification for having pro-war
speakers at an antiwar rally. There is no space
for presenting such confusion in a public action
that is supposed to be about taking a stand
against war and occupation.
Unfortunately we have seen examples of this kind
of behavior from Stopwar.ca over the past several
years and in the weeks leading up to the
demonstration. For instance, Stopwar.ca has
invited speakers who advocate the overthrow of the
independent government of Iran in the midst of an
imperialist campaign demanding the same. They have
also promoted other speakers who have compromised
antiwar, anti-occupation political principles.
Most recently, leading up to April 9th Stopwar.ca
played an active role in weekly demonstrations
organized by pro-war Libyans. In supporting these
demonstrations Stopwar.ca showed a complete
indifference and lack of responsibility for their
actions as an antiwar coalition in the midst of a
new war opening against the people of Libya.
Because of our experience in Vancouver we are
concerned that similar events played out in other
demonstrations across Canada. Did these other
rallies also have pro-war speakers? The CPA, as an
umbrella antiwar organization in Canada, has the
responsibility to provide leadership and a clear
political direction to its membership
organizations, especially at such a crucial time.
We have read the statement released by the CPA
“Support the Libyan people. Yes to freedom and
democracy across the Arab World! No Military
Intervention in Libya.” The confused position that
was presented at the April 9th demonstration
reflects this confused statement, which concludes,
“The best way to help the people of Libya is to
show our solidarity with their struggle.” Our role
as antiwar coalitions is not to take sides in a
civil war in an independent country under attack
by imperialists, but to clearly oppose any form of
foreign imperialist intervention which has never,
and will never, benefit the people of that
country. You can’t have it both ways at once – to
join in the imperialist campaign used to justify
the bombings while saying that you oppose the
bombings at the same time.
There is much to be learned from the coalitions
that have organized rallies in the US since the
imperialist campaign against Libya began. Through
statements, as well as the March 19th, March 26th
and April 9th mobilizations, organizations such as
ANSWER, the International Action Center (IAC) and
UNAC have taken a strong position against the
current war on the people of Libya. The difference
is that, in contrast to what we observed in
Vancouver, in the US the actions of these antiwar
and social justice organizations match their
words. From the lead banners to the signs and
rally speakers, to the UNAC report from NYC which
stated, “The new war in Libya has given rise to a
new movement, as the largest anti-war
demonstration New York has seen in years took to
the streets of Manhattan.” There was no
contradiction or confusion as they had the
leadership to take a strong stance against
imperialist intervention in Libya. This is an
example for all of us to follow.
II
MAWO has been participating in the same efforts,
in the spirit of anti-imperialism, cooperation,
and antiwar movement building. Starting from
even before the bombing of Libya began we have
organized 5 forums and 3 rallies, as well as
produced 2 buttons and launched a petition
campaign, all against foreign intervention in
Libya. We have also produced 3 antiwar
newsletters filled with news and analysis to
counter the lies being spread by imperialist
media on Libya and the uprisings and mass
movements in the Middle East and North Africa
(MENA). Within this newsletter are ideas and
statements we think are crucial at this time and
are much more appropriate be said at antiwar
rallies:
“There is no saving of human lives or any
humanitarian intervention on behalf of the
Libyan people that can be performed by
imperialist powers. Indeed, this is such an
obvious hypocrisy by these war mongers because
none of those precious human values mean
anything to them. One, we haven’t forgotten the
killings of millions of people in Vietnam, more
than a million people in Rwanda, killings of
more than one million people in Iraq just from
2003 until now, as well as hundreds of thousands
of innocent people in Afghanistan, Pakistan,
Congo, Nigeria, Sudan, Somalia and many other
poor and sovereign countries by the very same
imperial powers.” (read MAWO Newsletter #32 in
full at: (http://www.mawovancouver.org/materials/newsletters/newsletter32-5.pdf)
“This is a time to abandon all illusions that
there might be anything progressive and human to
overthrowing the Libyan government or helping
the opposition in Libya through imperialist
intervention such as sanctions, a no-fly zone or
military attacks…The unfolding mass
revolutionary movement and ousting of Mubarak
and Ben Ali in Egypt and Tunisia have been a
fresh struggle for anti-imperialist movements in
the region. It certainly reversed the setback
imposed on the working and poor people of the
world through the occupations of Afghanistan and
Iraq. What the great masses of North Africa and
the Middle East need to see is not another Iraq
but rather another Egypt.” (MAWO Newsletter #32)
III
Since our founding on October 29, 2003 MAWO
has always endorsed and supported Stopwar.ca,
the CPA and other groups whenever they have
organized antiwar work. However, we are also
clear that we don’t feel that bringing
occasional celebrity speakers and holding
sporadic events not connected to consistent
campaigns is enough to even begin scratching
the surface of building a strong antiwar
movement. This is unlike what we have seen in
the U.S. where there is a constant effort by
different political tendencies to improve and
build new fronts against imperialist
aggression. We have rarely spoken out publicly
about the huge blocks and slander we have
faced for years in our efforts to work in a
united way either with Stopwar.ca or the CPA,
but now is not the time to remain silent. Now
is not the time to remain divided based on
petty or sectarian differences, now is the
time to learn from the people of the Middle
East and North Africa as they rise up and
counter the imperialist domination they have
faced for decades. Interestingly and
ironically, as a Canadian-based coalition,
more so than in Canada, our efforts for unity
have had a great welcoming by U.S. coalitions
and social justice groups such as ANSWER,
UNAC, IAC, the Stop War On Iran coalition,
IFCO/Pastors for Peace and others.
We are making a strong call to Stopwar.ca and
the CPA:
1- Stop taking the unclear middle of the
road path and arm yourselves with a clear
antiwar, anti-occupation platform by
rejecting saying one thing and doing the
opposite.
2- Organize an open, inclusive, broad and
well organized public discussion on how to
build a united and effective antiwar
movement in Canada and world-wide.
We believe these are the only serious options
in response to the current situation. Today in
a joint letter the presidents of the United
States and France and the prime minister of
Britain declared, “there can be no peace in
Libya while Muammar Gaddafi stays in power,”
“Libyans in cities like Misrata and Ajdabiya
continue to suffer 'terrible horrors at
Gaddafi's hands',” “it is impossible to
imagine a future for Libya with Gaddafi in
power,” “To allow him to remain in power
'would be an unconscionable betrayal' of
Libya's people,” “So long as Gaddafi is in
power, NATO and its coalition partners must
maintain their operations so that civilians
remain protected and the pressure on the
regime builds,” and finally “Then a genuine
transition from dictatorship to an inclusive
constitutional process can really begin, led
by a new generation of leaders.” All
quotations are from the BBC, and the complete
letter is in the Washington Post April 14,
2011. Isn't it clear what colonial powers are
up to in Libya? Is this different than what
the Libyan opposition or the pro-war Libyans
that participated in your rally say? Where is
this confusion of giving a big platform to
pro-imperialist, pro-war Libyans coming from?
Let us discuss these issues out in the open.
We cannot let the mistakes of April 9th keep
us from moving forward. Those mistakes create
confusion among the masses that we would like
to take a stance against imperialist
aggression around the world, and if continued
they will indeed promote what imperialist
countries are advocating. We must clearly
oppose this new era of war and occupation
which began in 2001 in Afghanistan, and do our
part to counter it by organizing, educating
and mobilizing masses with a clear antiwar,
anti-occupation platform as the colonial
powers continue on this bloody path today, in
2011, against Libya. We believe these
politics, and this proposal for a public
discussion, are the way to build a broad,
united, and effective antiwar movement.
Mobilization Against War and Occupation (MAWO)
April 14, 2011
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Two examples from an audio transcription
of remarks
by the organizers:
1- Derrick O’Keefe (Co-chair, Stopwar.ca and
CPA)
“We’ve been working with the Tunisian,
Egyptian and Libyan communities here to build
solidarity for their uprisings in North Africa
and the Middle East. And we did today, we
invited the Libyan speakers who we’ve been in
touch with even though there’s a difference in
opinion about NATO’s intervention, we thought
it was important for them to have their say.
So it was a decision that we made
democratically as a coalition. We thank those
of you that had a respectful dialogue when
there was disagreement and we thank you for
listening. Umm, and think it is important, umm
and time over time, time will tell that NATO’s
intervention is not in good faith. And time
will tell that NATO’s intervention is going to
bring more death and destruction to people in
Libya who have already suffered so much for so
many years.”
2- Roger Annis (One of the MC's of the
Vancouver, April 9th rally)
“But we’re also aware of the fact that there
is a significant body of opinion in Libya that
we have heard today expressed in what they
think is required to do – so we will continue
to listen to that point of view, and we will
continue to discuss and debate it. We hope to
learn from the experiences and the opinions of
our Libyan brothers and sisters – we expect
that to be a mutual exchange as well. We are
living in very very difficult times in Libya
and throughout the Middle East. So one thing
we can all agree on, and that’s why we’re here
today – is to oppose war, to oppose military
intervention, to support people’s power, to
support the great Arab awakenings of
2010-2011, and with its continuation in the
years ahead. To support the right without
condition of the people of the Middle East to
freely determine their political future and
the establishment of democracy.”
|